Protect biodiversity with knife and fork

Whether it is controversial palm oil or cheap meat with a questionable climate balance, it is well known that certain foods are not good for the CO2 footprint. But how does the average German diet affect biological diversity?

A new study by the environmental organization WWF sheds light on the footprint we leave with our food in terms of the diversity of all life in the country. The result: what we eat has a huge impact on biodiversity, not only in this country, but also in regions far away.

Animal products account for most of the footprint

The so-called biodiversity footprint as a value in the WWF survey is calculated in a relatively complex way. Generally speaking, it is about the extent to which our diet affects natural areas with their animals and plants in Germany and worldwide.

In figures, the specific effects of the consumption of different foods are as follows: Animal products such as meat, sausages, eggs or cheese make up by far the largest proportion of the footprint, at 77%. Instead, only 23 percent result from the consumption of plant-based foods such as fruits, vegetables, cereals or nuts.

Large space requirement for animal feed

In the case of animal products, it is above all the large amount of space required for animal feed that has a negative impact. Everything we have on our plates or buy is produced somewhere and therefore needs space, Tanja Drger, nutrition expert at WWF Germany, told the dpa. On the one hand, one depends on the services of an untouched nature, but on the other hand, one puts it in danger. The result, summarizes the study, is that the higher the proportion of plant-based foods in the diet, the smaller the biodiversity footprint it causes worldwide.

Experts have long seen a downward trend in biological diversity: The World Biodiversity Council (IPBES) warns that around a million animal and plant species could become extinct in just a few decades. According to the panel of experts, our nutritional systems play a key role here. They are responsible for 70 percent of biodiversity loss on land and 50 percent in rivers and lakes.

Vegetarian and vegan diets significantly reduce the footprint

In addition to the current situation, the WWF survey also looks at how a change in the diet of Germans could benefit biological diversity. On a flexitarian diet, which includes limited consumption of animal products, our global biodiversity footprint could be reduced by 18%, on a consistent vegetarian diet by up to 46%, on a vegan diet by 49%.

Consequently, nature in Brazil would particularly benefit from a corresponding rethinking of the diet, not least because much less area would then be required to grow soybeans as animal feed.

Whether it’s bees, possums or butterflies in Germany, orangutans in Malaysia, or anteaters and jaguars in Brazil, there are numerous species that could be protected through more conscious nutrition, Drger emphasizes. In this sense, there is great potential to contribute to the protection of habitats by reducing the consumption of animal products. And it’s also good for your own health. Therefore, the study should raise awareness of the effects that the consumption of food itself can have.

Labeling friendship with the weather helps

A new study by a team led by Ann-Katrin Betz of the Julius-Maximilians-University in Wrzburg suggests that people in restaurants are more likely to choose climate-friendly foods if they are labeled as such on the menu and the benefits for environment. their consumption behavior is made clear to them, they are made aware of it.

In the survey, published in the Plos Clima magazine, 256 people chose between several hypothetical menus. They were found to choose more climate-friendly dishes when carbon labeling was present and when components tended to consist of low-emission options.

Above all, start

However, Drger emphasizes that the burden cannot fall solely on the shoulders of consumers. Politics and business are in demand here. Specifically, based on its results, WWF calls on the federal government to implement a food strategy until 2023 and move towards a sustainability tax. We are currently seeing that some plant-based foods or meat substitutes are more expensive than the meat itself, criticizes Drger. In addition, the domestic cultivation of fruits, vegetables, nuts and legumes should be expanded.

Antje Risius, who researches sustainable eating styles at the University of Gottingen, sums up what each and every individual must do to protect biodiversity, and what politics and business must do: Above all, start. The efficient use of resources is crucial. A plant-based diet allows you to combine health, economic and environmental aspects.

But that means for consumers that information and products must be available. Of course, those who set the framework conditions, that is, politics and business, are called first, says Risius. Creating fair framework conditions for the corresponding adjustment of eating habits is a task for society as a whole.

Leave your vote

Leave a Comment

Log In

Forgot password?

Forgot password?

Enter your account data and we will send you a link to reset your password.

Your password reset link appears to be invalid or expired.

Log in

Privacy Policy

Add to Collection

No Collections

Here you'll find all collections you've created before.